We are up to Book II chapter 5 of Ben Hur and you
stayed with me!
I’m skipping chapter 5 because you would be better off
spending your time reading your Bible and reading real history, not Wallace’s
faked hash, and going to chapter 6 we meet a new character, Tirzah, the
daughter of the house.
And her clothing is all wrong. Jewish women did not
expose their bodies, even at home. Her arms should be covered at least from
shoulder to elbow. And you should be
going “say what?”
I just said a couple of posts ago that when a man dies
and leaves a widow, sons and daughters, the mother and sons can join to marry
off an underage daughter. They can’t do this for a grown daughter, but she must
be supported from the income of the man’s property. The son gets a job or goes
begging to have an income.
Except.
Judah’s father could have written a deed of gift to
Judah either before his death or while on his deathbed. The deed was valid in
either case, except that on his deathbed the father had to reserve some of the
property to himself. Then if he recovered he had an income.
A prudent man should write three deeds of gift: one
for his widow; one for his daughter(s); and one for his son, with the
reservation of property in this last. All three should say “after my death” or
“from now and after my death”. In this second case, they all have an income and
it’s not tied up into a will, which only takes effect after death. But stuff
happens.
If Ithamar wrote a deed of gift, Judah isn’t running a
business for the benefit of his mother and sister; he’s running it so he has
his own income. He may be managing the property covered by the other two deeds,
or a relative is managing it.
But the real issue in this chapter is, both Tirzah and
Judah should be married. In a world without scientific medication, where
doctors functioned on anecdotal evidence, few infants reached the age of 5 and
another tranche didn’t reach the age of 15. If Judah’s father was alive when
Tirzah was 13, he would at least have started the search for a husband and
written a deed to cover her dowry. Judah would have been 15 to 18 at the time,
and Mishnah Pirkey Avot 5:21 says marriage happens at 18. Judah is 21. He
should have a wife and at least one child, or one on the way.
Tirzah would be living with her husband, even if she’s
16 and just married.
The mother would be living in a dower house on the
property covered by her deed of gift.
So again, Wallace is committing the fallacy of
Presentism. He’s writing the classic Victorian melodrama where the widow and
her children stay together. And it wasn’t so. Not in those times; not in Judea;
not in Rome, so Messala should also not be a bachelor at this point. Oh, sure,
he probably left his wife home with the paterfamilias, especially if there were
children already. But his wife, like Agrippina, might follow the drum and bring
the children along.
No comments:
Post a Comment