We are up to Book II chapter 3 of Ben Hur and I want
to finish off something I said last time because it probably hasn’t occurred to
most readers.
There was no reform or conservative Judaism in the
Roman Empire. There were no Chassidic Jews or Reconstructionists. You had the
P’rushim like Rabbis Hillel and Shammai; you had the Ts’dukim who evaporated
after the destruction of the Second Temple. You had the Samaritans who were on
a downhill slide because you had to be born a Samaritan, you couldn’t convert.
And you had the common people who couldn’t afford the time to get a solid
Jewish education and might not know about new enactments of the Sanhedrin. In a
good edition of Mishnah there will be an index of rabbis linked to sections
that report their decisions, so you can go through and see what they ruled and
get an idea of when it happened from their biographies.
Everything in Mishnah that isn’t cited to an
individual rabbi is an agreed position of the Sanhedrin by 50 CE. At least 50%
of Mishnah falls into this category. And because Judaism is a culture,
everybody grew up living by these rules. So you didn’t have to stop in the
middle of the day and say, now, what did my teacher say about – let’s say,
finding a dead bug on the greens I just sprinkled with water to keep them fresh.
You knew from growing crops every year that you had to throw out the greens
that the bug touched.
Judah ben Hur, a rich boy, should have been brought up
first to read Torah and live by it. Judah should have accompanied his father
Ithamar in his business dealings and also, since the father was a rich and
important man, in his attending Jewish courts.
That’s because he was eligible to be a witness in
business cases, such as testifying to signatures and seals on documents. (Judah
was eligible to testify to his father’s signature and seal even before bar
mitsvah.) He was also eligible to be a judge. In a civil case, each of the two
parties chooses a judge and then they agree on the third, which gets them part
way to agreeing about the case.
If a case reached an impasse, anybody observing the
case could speak up about it. If what he said was relevant, probative, and
exculpatory, he joined the judges’ bench and then another person was chosen to
make sure there was always an odd number of judges. The father would have
wanted Judah to be ready to join the judges’ bench as an adult, and he would
have taken the boy to court with him every time he attended.
Judah was minimally eligible for a witness or a judge
as soon as he passed the age of bar mitsvah, 13 years and one day. He was not
running around with a Gentile boy or reading Greek philosophy; he was living
his culture, learning or running the family business, and attending the courts
where he learned and maybe participated in applying or formulating Jewish law. There
was no 8 years of idly waiting for his majority before Book II opens.
Judah running wild with a Gentile boy is a plot device
Wallace needs to carry out his work. It is not realistic, any more than the
idea that Judah was a self-hating Jew, uneducated and vulnerable to conversion.
So a major component of Wallace’s plot dissolves in the face of reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment